泰安非遗“花边伞”春节走俏海内外市场******
(新春走基层)泰安非遗“花边伞”春节走俏海内外市场
中新网泰安1月31日电 (梁犇 徐峰)1月31日，春节假期刚过，山东省泰安市岱岳区大汶口镇的一家工艺伞厂一片繁忙，宽敞明亮的厂房内，一把把大小不一、花样繁多的伞十分精美。“这是花边伞，这批货是海外客户年前预定的，近期就要发货了。”该厂负责人唐斌杰对记者说。
秀工们在制作大汶口花边伞。 陈阳 摄从春节前的2个月开始，唐斌杰的花边伞厂就开始忙了起来。
今年45岁的唐斌杰是大汶口镇前东庄村人，自幼跟着父亲学习花边技艺，是大汶口花边技艺的第四代传承人，熟悉20余种花边技艺针法，是远近闻名的花边伞制作艺人。
消费者正在挑选大汶口花边伞。 陈阳 摄大汶口花边技艺距今已有两千多年的历史，是中国传统织绣工艺的典型代表，素有“抽纱瑰宝”的称号。大汶口花边技艺是在图纸上编织成各种主花图案，以棉线、麻线、丝线等各种织物为原料，经过绣制和编织而成的装饰性镂空伞制品。“在编织过程中，每道工序都要十分严谨。”唐斌杰说。
秀工在图样上进行手工刺绣。 陈阳 摄千百年来，随着花边技艺传承发展，会花边伞制作的艺人越来越多，规模越来越大，形成了以大汶口镇为中心，辐射周边乡镇的花边伞制作与销售区域。
几年前，在外打工的唐斌杰返乡创业发展花边技艺特色文化产业。创业之初，为了招到会花边技艺的绣工，唐斌杰到处奔走联系农户，采取“先给钱后加工”的方式，探索乡镇加工点的合作生产模式。
工人正在固定伞架。 陈阳 摄由于花边技艺生产的产品多种多样，技艺复杂，需要人手多，唐斌杰就以农户为单位，将原材料送到绣工家里，然后统一回收销售。
“俺在家里就能干，不用出门就挣钱了。”大汶口镇申东村57岁的村民候春玲是一名绣工，这几年，她通过做绣工，每年可增收15000余元。如今，像胡春玲一样，与唐斌杰合作的绣工已有300余人。
制作好的大汶口花边伞。 陈阳 摄近年来，随着科技发展，万能绣花机和电脑绣花机普及，传统的花边手工技艺受到了影响。作为花边技艺传承人，出于对花边技艺的热爱，唐斌杰仍坚持传统手工制作，坚持守正创新，把新学的设计理念创新运用到刺绣工艺伞上。
为更好地开拓市场，唐斌杰一方面将现代设计融入传统工艺，创新设计出花边伞和花边扇；另一方面利用亚马逊、阿里巴巴等电商平台，迅速在国内国际市场打开销路，与10余个国家和地区建立了稳定的供销关系，年订单量超50万件。“我们的产品供不应求，订单已排到了今年6月份。”
秀工在手工印刷花边伞图样。 陈阳 摄在当地政府支持下，唐斌杰在新时代文明实践中心设立工作室，为当地无法外出工作或者暂时失业的妇女培训花边技艺100余人次，帮助300多名农村富余劳动力实现就业。
“春节过后，我们计划加强对绣工花边技艺培训，持续创新产品设计，为传统花边艺持续注入新活力，做大做强花边技艺产业，带领村民们持续增收致富。”唐斌杰说。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
